AdmiraltyLaw.com

Canadian maritime law, admiralty law and shipping law

 

 

Top 5 Requests

bullet Shipping Law News
bullet Admiralty Practice
bullet Marine Insurance
bullet Carriage of Goods
bullet Statutes
bullet Papers

Browse by Topics

bullet Admiralty Practice
bullet Admiralty Jurisdiction
bullet Carriage of Goods
bullet Carriage of Passengers
bullet Collisions
bullet Fisheries Law
bullet Liens
bullet Limitation Periods
bullet Limitation of Liability
bullet Marine Insurance
bullet Miscellaneous Topics
bullet Offshore
bullet Pollution
bullet Tug and Tow

Other Pages

bullet Shipping Law News
bullet Statutes and Regs
bullet Papers
bullet Table of Cases
bullet Giaschi & Margolis
bullet Guest Book
bullet Links
bullet Site Map
bullet UBC Law332
bullet Search

 

First Previous Next Last Index  

Slide 3 of 39

Notes:

 

    Traditionally, nuisance was the most common cause of action asserted at common law. Nuisance is interference with the use and enjoyment of the land belonging to another. There must be interference with the land. The requirement that there be interference with the land is one of the limiting factors of a nuisance action as the action is only available to owners and occupiers of land.
    There are two types of nuisance: Private Nuisance and Public Nuisance. Private nuisance is a nuisance that affects an individual citizen only. It is actionable by that individual. Spills, however, are rarely so focused that they affect only one individual. Most spills affect a large number of the population.
    Public nuisance is an injury to the public at large (as is normally the case with water pollution). It is actionable only by the Attorney General. Individuals generally have no cause of action for a public nuisance. There is an exception, however. A private action for a public nuisance is available if the plaintiff can prove a substantial injury beyond that suffered by the general public. This test is difficult to meet.
    Fault or negligence is an essential element of a claim in nuisance involving a navigable waterway. This is a special requirement as normally nuisance is actionable without proof of fault. However, the House of Lords long ago decided that fault was essential for a nuisance emanating from a public highway. This requirement has been carried over to public navigable waterways.
    There is no limitation period for a claim in nuisance so long as the nuisance continues.

 

Copyright 1994-2007 © 
Christopher J. Giaschi 
 
Giaschi & Margolis
Barristers & Solicitors, 401-815 Hornby St. 
Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2E6, Canada. 
(tel.) 604 681-2866 (fax) 604 681-4260  

(e-mail)
giaschi@admiraltylaw.com  (internet) http://www.admiraltylaw.com