AdmiraltyLaw.com

Canadian maritime law, admiralty law and shipping law

 

 

Top 5 Requests

bullet Shipping Law News
bullet Admiralty Practice
bullet Marine Insurance
bullet Carriage of Goods
bullet Statutes
bullet Papers

Browse by Topics

bullet Admiralty Practice
bullet Admiralty Jurisdiction
bullet Carriage of Goods
bullet Carriage of Passengers
bullet Collisions
bullet Fisheries Law
bullet Liens
bullet Limitation Periods
bullet Limitation of Liability
bullet Marine Insurance
bullet Miscellaneous Topics
bullet Offshore
bullet Pollution
bullet Tug and Tow

Other Pages

bullet Shipping Law News
bullet Statutes and Regs
bullet Papers
bullet Table of Cases
bullet Giaschi & Margolis
bullet Guest Book
bullet Links
bullet Site Map
bullet UBC Law332
bullet Search

 

First Previous Next Last Index  

Slide 4 of 39

Notes:

 

    To maintain an action in trespass there must be direct interference with land belonging to another (i.e. there must be direct damage to the land). The action is therefore only available to an owner/occupier of land.
    There must also be a direct deposit of the pollutant onto the land. Again this a limiting factor as many water pollutants do not directly affect the foreshore. For example, as a result of a pollution incident all marine life could be destroyed but there would be no action in trespass unless there was damage to the foreshore and even then the owner of the foreshore could only recover for the damage to the foreshore.
    There is a defence of Necessity to an action for trespass but it is rarely allowed.
    Trespass is actionable per se. The means that the mere act of trespass is actionable. The claimant is not required to prove anything but the act of trespass.

 

Copyright 1994-2007 © 
Christopher J. Giaschi 
 
Giaschi & Margolis
Barristers & Solicitors, 401-815 Hornby St. 
Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2E6, Canada. 
(tel.) 604 681-2866 (fax) 604 681-4260  

(e-mail)
giaschi@admiraltylaw.com  (internet) http://www.admiraltylaw.com