AdmiraltyLaw.com

Canadian maritime law, admiralty law and shipping law

 

 

Top 5 Requests

bullet Shipping Law News
bullet Admiralty Practice
bullet Marine Insurance
bullet Carriage of Goods
bullet Statutes
bullet Papers

Browse by Topics

bullet Admiralty Practice
bullet Admiralty Jurisdiction
bullet Carriage of Goods
bullet Carriage of Passengers
bullet Collisions
bullet Fisheries Law
bullet Liens
bullet Limitation Periods
bullet Limitation of Liability
bullet Marine Insurance
bullet Miscellaneous Topics
bullet Offshore
bullet Pollution
bullet Tug and Tow

Other Pages

bullet Shipping Law News
bullet Statutes and Regs
bullet Papers
bullet Table of Cases
bullet Giaschi & Margolis
bullet Guest Book
bullet Links
bullet Site Map
bullet UBC Law332
bullet Search

 

First Previous Next Last Index  

Slide 6 of 39

Notes:

 

    An action under the Rylands v Fletcher doctrine is available to anyone who has suffered injury as the result of the escape of a dangerous substance from adjoining lands. To maintain an action under the Rylands v Fletcher doctrine the plaintiff must establish:
    1. That the defendant kept a substance that was likely to cause damage should it escape the defendant’s land;
    2. That the substance did escape; and
    3. That the plaintiff suffered damage as a consequence.
    Note that negligence or fault is not a necessary element of the tort.
    As with Negligence, the damages recoverable are limited by the pure economic loss doctrine and the concept of remoteness.

 

Copyright 1994-2007 © 
Christopher J. Giaschi 
 
Giaschi & Margolis
Barristers & Solicitors, 401-815 Hornby St. 
Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2E6, Canada. 
(tel.) 604 681-2866 (fax) 604 681-4260  

(e-mail)
giaschi@admiraltylaw.com  (internet) http://www.admiraltylaw.com