Dongnam Oil & Fats Co. v. Chemex Ltd. et al., 2004 FC 1732

In Arbitration/Jurisdiction Clauses in Maritime Law, In Rem Actions and Arrest on (Updated )

This matter concerned damage to a cargo of bleached tallow to be carried from Newark, New Jersey to Inchon, Korea. The cargo was to be carried on board the ship “Tuapse”. The “Tuapse” was owned by Novoship but chartered under a head charter to Chemex. The head charter provided for London arbitration. The Plaintiff and Chemex entered into a voyage …

Full Summary

Z.I. Pompey Industrie v. ECU-Line N.V., 2003 SCC 27

In Arbitration/Jurisdiction Clauses in Maritime Law on (Updated )

The Plaintiffs claimed that cargo carried from Belgium to Canada and then on to the US was damaged. The Appellant shipowner sought to rely on an exclusive jurisdiction clause in the bill of lading referring claims to the Courts of Belgium. The matter arose before s.46(1) of the Marine Liability Act came into force. The Prothonotary refused to uphold the …

Full Summary

Nestle Canada Inc. v. The "Viljandi" et al., 2003 FCT 28

In Arbitration/Jurisdiction Clauses in Maritime Law on (Updated )

This was an an application for a stay of proceedings on the basis of a jurisdiction clause contained in a bill of lading. The Court refused the stay on the grounds that the action had been commenced after the Marine Liability Act was proclaimed in force (August 8, 2001) and, therefore, the matter was covered by s. 46(1) of the …

Full Summary

Incremona-Salerno v. The "Castor" and "Katsuragi", 2002 FCA 479

In Arbitration/Jurisdiction Clauses in Maritime Law on (Updated )

The issue in these applications was whether s. 46(1) of the he Marine Liability Act, (which provides that notwithstanding any jurisdiction or arbitration clause claims arising under a contract of carriage of goods by water may be brought in Canada where inter alia the port of loading or port of discharge is in Canada) applies to actions commenced prior to …

Full Summary

Atlantic Cement Carriers Ltd. v. Atlantic Towing Ltd., 2002 FCT 761

In Arbitration/Jurisdiction Clauses in Maritime Law on (Updated )

This was an application by a tug owner to stay proceedings commenced in the Federal Court by the owner of a barge for damages sustained because of the sinking of the barge and for an indemnity for any amounts the barge owner might be required to pay to the owner of the cargo on board the barge at the time …

Full Summary

Mariana Maritime S.A. v. Stella Jones Inc., 2002 FCA 215

In Arbitration/Jurisdiction Clauses in Maritime Law on (Updated )

This was an appeal from an Order by the motions Judge dismissing an application by the Defendant carriers for a stay of proceedings. The facts were that the parties had entered into a “Conline” booking note for the carriage of the Plaintiffs’ cargo. The booking note specified that its terms would be superceded by the terms of the bill of …

Full Summary

Encan Liquidation v. Transintra Canada, 2000 CanLII 16598

In Arbitration/Jurisdiction Clauses in Maritime Law on (Updated )

This was an application by the Defendant carrier to stay a Third Party claim brought against it by a co-Defendant, the freight forwarder of the Plaintiff cargo owner, on the basis of a jurisdiction clause in the bill of lading. The Court noted that the bill of lading was a contract between the carrier and the "Merchant" as defined. The …

Full Summary

Hyundai Merchant Marine Co. Ltd. v. Anraj Fish Products Industries Ltd. et al., 2000 CanLII 15628

In Appeals, Arbitration/Jurisdiction Clauses in Maritime Law on (Updated )

This was an appeal from an order of a Motions Judge in which the Motions Judge overturned the order of a Prothonotary staying the action on the grounds of a jurisdiction clause in the bill of lading selecting Korea as the appropriate jurisdiction. The Federal Court of Appeal stated that the standard of review on an appeal of this sort, …

Full Summary

Texserv Inc. v. Incon Container USA Ltd., 2000 CanLII 22371

In Arbitration/Jurisdiction Clauses in Maritime Law on (Updated )

This was an application by the Defendant carrier to stay proceedings on the basis of a jurisdiction clause in the bill of lading requiring actions to be commenced in Florida. The Court declined the stay on the basis that the contract of carriage was effected before the bill of lading was issued, the Plaintiff was not aware of the jurisdiction …

Full Summary

Thyssen Canada Limited v. The "Mariana, [2000] 3 FC 398

In Arbitration/Jurisdiction Clauses in Maritime Law on (Updated )

This was a motion to stay proceedings and refer the matter to arbitration pursuant to an arbitration clause contained in a charter party and incorporated by reference in the bill of lading. Clause 1 of the bill of lading expressly incorporated the charter party including any choice of law clause or arbitration clause. However, the details of the charter party …

Full Summary