Marshall v. Regina, [1999] 3 SCR 456

In Aboriginal Rights/Defences, Fish Cases on (Updated )

This case involved a Mikmaq Indian who was charged with fishing with a prohibited net during a closed period and selling fish without a licence in violation of Federal fishery regulations. The main issue in the case was whether he possessed a treaty right to sell fish so as to be exempted from compliance with regulations. The Majority of the …

Full Summary

Yale Indian Band v. Aitchelitz Indian Band, 1998 CanLII 8063

In Aboriginal Rights/Defences, Fish Cases on (Updated )

This case involved an application by the Fisheries Council of B.C. for intervener status. The court held that since the action was essentially a "rivalry, skirmish and contest between Indian bands over where they might catch their given allocation of salmon, this is not a case where the Fisheries Council had a legitimate interest in the outcome. To allow the …

Full Summary

Marshall v. R., [1999] 3 SCR 533

In Aboriginal Rights/Defences, Fish Cases on (Updated )

This was an application by an intervener, West Nova Fisherman’s Coalition, in the Marshall appeal to have the appeal reheard, with a stay pending appeal. Although the application was denied, the court issued reasons clarifying portions of its earlier judgment on September 17, 1999. In particular the court said as follows: (1) The Government of Canada has power to regulate …

Full Summary

R v. Seward, B.C.J. NO. 1726

In Aboriginal Rights/Defences, Fish Cases on (Updated )

This case involved four first nations accuseds, who were charged with harvesting clams in a closed area, namely, the Nanaimo estuary. At trial, evidence was led that that the Nanaimo First Nations Band and the Federal Government had entered into an agreement to suspend the treaty rights to harvest in that area because of pollutants in the area creating a …

Full Summary

Canada v. Peters, 2001 BCSC 873

In Aboriginal Rights/Defences, Fish Cases on (Updated )

This case involved three aboriginal fishermen charged with fishing the early Stuart run in the Fraser River without a licence. At trial, the Crown conceded that their aboriginal right to fish had been infringed. Accordingly, the issue before the court was whether or not the Crown was justified in imposing the closure of the fishery for conservation purposes. At trial, …

Full Summary

R v. Dedam, 2002 NBQB 90

In Aboriginal Rights/Defences, Fish Cases on (Updated )

This case involved and an aboriginal lobster fisherman from New Brunswick who was charged with obstructing a fisheries officer. At a pre-trial application, the fisherman applied to have state funded counsel appointed to conduct a defence based upon aboriginal rights that was estimated to cost approximately one million dollars. After reviewing the authorities, the court ordered a stay of proceedings …

Full Summary

R v. Bartibogue, 2002 NBQB 147

In Aboriginal Rights/Defences, Fish Cases on (Updated )

This case involved and a number of aboriginal fishermen from New Brunswick who were charged with obstructing a fisheries officer and a number of other offences related to attempting to enforce their Marshall type claim to treaty rights to fish for lobster. At the Provincial Court level a successful pre-trial application was brought in the case of R. v. Dedam …

Full Summary